What's Behind the Drive to Stop Open Source Noncompliance? (Jan. 30, '15)



Return to News & Media

 

IBSMA.com

Terms of use

What's Behind the Drive to Stop Open Source Noncompliance?

The notion of license enforcement of open source software seems counter to the principles of the open source movement. Yet, not only are license noncompliance claims increasing, it's just the tip of the iceberg, says Heather Meeker, a leading intellectual property transactions lawyer at O’Melveny & Myers, and speaker at the upcoming Compliance Manager Summit in San Francisco, March 12-13.

Why will the software industry experience a surge in open source license compliance issues in the next few years?

There are several factors, says Meeker. First there's more open source development and more companies using open source. A recent Gartner study claimed 50 percent of technology companies use open source as a part of their IT strategy.

Next, both the developers and those engaged in enforcement have gotten more sophisticated and tougher about open source licenses. "The people enforcing the licenses are paying a lot more attention than they used to," says Meeker. "There used to be relatively little enforcement of the open source licenses, but now, both formal and informal claims are increasing.”

Open source enforcement typically takes the form of an intellectual property claim, according to Meeker. "And while there can be damages associated with that, they are not usually very high. The bigger costs have to do with business disruption." Targets of an open source license violation claim may have to quickly reengineer their product and issue a compliant version, which can be expensive, and delays product development. “No one wants to spend time fixing license problems. They want to push out new products.”

Targets of most of the open source compliance claims are consumer electronic manufacturers because they make high-profile examples of the cost of misusing open source software. "Open source license enforcement groups will target consumer products to make more of a public impact," says Meeker. "But they also target enterprise software providers."

The main effect software publishers see from the open source license compliance push is from their clients. There's a new demand by customers for proof that the software they're buying is open source compliant. "Customers have gotten a lot more knowledgeable about open source licenses," says Meeker. "They are demanding squeaky clean compliance, lists of disclosures, reps and warranties on open source compliance. And if you can’t show that you have compliance processes in place and provide them the information they ask for about open source, customers may just not buy your product.”

This is an interesting twist on compliance—the consumer demanding vendor license compliance—because the risks are real for software customers. "Liability for noncompliance can occur at all levels of the distribution chain. Customers know they can’t shift the blame to the supplier," Meeker points out. "The enforcers can go after everybody in the whole chain of distribution.

The open source license enforcement bodies are better funded, more active and more determined than ever to defend the principles of open source software, and their actions getting noticed. As Meeker puts it: "It’s just going to keep escalating.”

Join us at the 2015 Compliance Manager Summit in San Francisco, March 12-13, to hear Heather Meeker and others discuss the new challenges and opportunities in software license compliance.

To view the Summit's full agenda and to register to attend, visit IBSMASummit.com.

Published by ECP Media LC
P.O. Box 1549 | Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106-1549 U.S.A.
ECPweb.com | Office and fax: 1.734.930.1925

ECP articles are provided to IBSMA by arrangement with ECPweb.com.

Terms of use

This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information regarding the subject matter. Neither the publisher nor the author(s) is offering legal, accounting or tax advice. Although care has been exercised and every attempt made to verify the information in this publication, neither the publisher nor the author(s) is responsible for errors or omissions. Neither the publisher nor the author(s) is affiliated with nor endorsed by any organization listed here or by any subsidiary company. Trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ITIL® is a registered trademark of the United Kingdom's Office of Government Commerce. The Certified by ECPweb.com logo is a licensed trademark of ECP Media. The publication may be printed for personal use. The publication MAY NOT be printed for distribution in a public or private venue (i.e., conferences, trade shows, direct mailing, etc.).

© 2015 ECP Media LC (ECPweb.com) No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopied, recorded or other) without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher.

IT IS ILLEGAL TO DISTRIBUTE OR RESELL THIS PUBLICATION IN ANY FORM WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE PUBLISHER. THIS PUBLICATION IS LICENSED FOR PERSONAL USE. IN ADDITION TO LEGAL ACTION, THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER MAY BE CHARGED FOR ALL ILLEGAL COPIES.